The continuous trade disputes between the United States and China have created substantial strains on American tech enterprises, compelling them to adjust to unforeseen financial hurdles. The latest tariff hikes by President Donald Trump’s administration have altered the fiscal landscape for companies dependent on Chinese production. For numerous technology firms, these measures have resulted in heightened expenses, interrupted supply networks, and greater unpredictability, leaving the industry in a vulnerable state.
Deena Ghazarian, who established the electronics firm Austere in California, felt the impact of these shifts directly. Just after starting her company in 2019, she encountered an unexpected 25% tariff on the premium audio and video accessories imported from China. Her once-promising business venture rapidly transformed into a financial battle. The new expenses, which were not a concern before, jeopardized the continuation of her enterprise.
“I truly believed my business wouldn’t survive its initial year,” Ghazarian remembers. The abrupt enforcement of tariffs compelled her to take on the extra costs to remain competitive, making her profit margins extremely narrow. Although Austere survived the early hurdles, the company is now dealing with a similar situation as tariffs have come back with a wider range and increased rates during Trump’s second term.
“I honestly thought my company wouldn’t make it through its first year,” Ghazarian recalls. The sudden implementation of tariffs forced her to absorb the added expenses to stay competitive, leaving her margins razor-thin. Although Austere managed to endure the initial challenges, the company now finds itself navigating a similar predicament as tariffs have returned with even broader scope and higher rates under Trump’s second term.
The current tariff structure significantly impacts a wide range of electronic goods, including smartphones, tablets, laptops, and video game consoles, many of which are predominantly produced in China. According to the Consumer Technology Association (CTA), China remains the largest supplier of electronics to the United States, with imports totaling $146 billion as recently as 2023. This includes 78% of smartphones, 79% of laptops and tablets, and nearly 87% of video game consoles entering the U.S. market.
The financial burden of these tariffs falls directly on U.S. importers rather than manufacturers in China, leaving American businesses and consumers to shoulder the costs. Ed Brzytwa, vice president of international trade at the CTA, points out that these additional expenses often trickle down to shoppers in the form of higher prices. For companies operating on slim profit margins, passing these costs onto consumers becomes unavoidable.
Although certain companies have tried to find alternatives to Chinese manufacturing by moving supply chains to nations like Vietnam, Thailand, and India, these changes are neither swift nor economical. Mary Lovely, a senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics, notes that building new supplier connections requires both time and significant resources. Furthermore, only a few countries can match the scale and proficiency that China provides, which continues to be a key player in worldwide technology production.
The tariffs are included in a larger effort by the Trump administration to tackle trade imbalances, boost domestic production, and decrease the influx of illegal drugs and migrants into the United States. However, these policies have provoked countermeasures from major trading partners, like Canada, Mexico, and China, intensifying tensions and complicating global trade relationships.
Domestic production in the U.S. has seen slight growth due to these tariffs, with firms such as Apple increasing manufacturing in India and Taiwanese chipmaker TSMC expanding to Arizona. Despite these initiatives, the move towards local manufacturing encounters obstacles, including elevated operational expenses and strict regulations.
For smaller companies like Austere, the enduring effects of these tariffs are a major worry. Ghazarian considers the option of increasing prices to counterbalance expenses but is concerned about losing customers in an already challenging economic climate. “There’s a threshold to what consumers are ready to pay for perceived value,” she notes. “If we exceed that, we risk losing them completely, particularly with inflation already squeezing household finances.”
For smaller businesses like Austere, the long-term consequences of these tariffs remain a primary concern. Ghazarian acknowledges the possibility of raising prices to offset costs but worries about alienating customers in an already strained economic environment. “There’s a limit to what customers are willing to pay for perceived value,” she says. “If we go beyond that, we risk losing them entirely, especially with inflation already tightening household budgets.”
The possibility of an economic downturn in the U.S. introduces additional complexity to the situation. Should growth wane, the administration might reassess its tariff strategy to prevent further economic harm. Currently, though, the likelihood of relaxing trade barriers appears slim, as Trump has indicated intentions to increase tariffs on Chinese products and broaden duties to other nations.
The effects of these policies reach beyond the United States. Should Chinese manufacturers move production to nations with elevated labor costs, worldwide prices for technology products might increase. Moreover, retaliatory tariffs from other countries could hinder the flow of U.S. technology exports, putting additional pressure on the industry.
Despite these hurdles, Ghazarian remains resolute in her efforts to adjust. By accumulating inventory prior to the imposition of the latest tariffs, she has secured short-term relief to endure the challenges. Looking forward, she is investigating ways to reduce expenses and exploring different production techniques to sustain her business. “I had hoped to concentrate on expansion and innovation, but instead, a significant portion of my time is devoted to survival tactics,” she expresses.
Despite these challenges, Ghazarian remains determined to adapt. By stockpiling inventory before the latest tariffs went into effect, she has gained temporary relief to weather the storm. Looking ahead, she is exploring cost-cutting measures and alternative production methods to keep her business afloat. “I had hoped to focus on growth and innovation, but instead, so much of my time is spent on survival strategies,” she laments.
The ongoing trade war underscores the delicate balance between economic policy and its unintended consequences. While the administration’s tariffs aim to achieve broader geopolitical goals, they have created ripple effects that reverberate through industries and households alike. For U.S. tech firms, the road ahead will require resilience, adaptability, and a willingness to navigate an increasingly uncertain global trade landscape.
